Redefine God - Open Source Religion and Religion 2.0

The Open Source Religion & Spirituality Project and Religion 2.0

Please answer once and only once, and in 3 words or less. Do not address other posts- state your opinion as concisely as possible.
----------

What is the fundamental logic of the impossibility of indifference?

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

]:o)

Reply to This

Life is Good.

Reply to This

roll the dice

Reply to This

nonaction is action

Reply to This

individualistic relativistic entanglements

Reply to This

I'm amazed. Almost every response has some truth to it. ]:o)

{sorry, Jim, chance has nothing to do with it} ]:o^

Reply to This

RSS

Books by Amazon

Latest Activity

I have a dream that some day we are in equilibrium with nature and the forests again will be old growth forests. I love forests and just went to a park today that is still old growth. It's sort of sad actually to have a park for old growth.
3 hours ago
David, got to agree there is no separation between humanity and nature. We are all part of nature by the simple fact that we perceive ourselves as being present in this physical realm. The only difference I have seen is that nature just is that whic…
6 hours ago
david thurman added a blog post
I have a strong opinion of no on this topic. We exist in a divide between our historical past of articulation of the cosmos from in internal source reaching back in time, as we exist with an eternal source of the empirical moving towards that intern…
8 hours ago
nice!!!!.I have to tell you Sid, I've been challenged and I've challenged others and i think we should grow through that process to be more critical thinkers which I feel is what this site is best at..The kitchen gets a little warm sometimes but as…
9 hours ago
i might add thank you for making me send pictures, I'll just start posting this pic everything and say "prove that it is not this" try again. Hell I might just generate a instant posting I could do this easily Thanks kernal for the insight on this M…
12 hours ago
Here is a picture to make it simpler. You affirm the below to be true and I say false. that's all. I say false every time I hear it is all. Prove to me that below is not what you are saying.
12 hours ago
No David, I am not nuts. We understand what you are saying. You have repeated it enough. I am suggesting it is a matter of listening. Repeating yourself will not solve this problem. This question of Mind(Consciousness)/Matter dichotomy is not reso…
13 hours ago
ZERO DIVISION ABSTRACT?CONCRETE. IT's church to split it.
18 hours ago
this is so true, I walk to the beach look out BOOM it hits me. My children BOOM it hits me. So my all is one is always never a splitting of but a holding together of that experience at it's base. So that is why I don't drop into the material or imma…
18 hours ago
Spot on Bill. From my take Bill the Platonist's understood this 2500 years ago very well. I've actually written a post or two about the usage or influence of psychedelics used in Greek Culture in Socrates time and in regards to the Eleusinian Myster…
18 hours ago
SOUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! there is zero divide between material and immaterial one is an aspect of the other are you nuts? I'm sorry Kernal but to flip down into reductive split is fantasy pure and simple and that is all you seem to want to express. I am s…
19 hours ago
sweetguy, the wrath of God added a discussion
The text below is a release from the International Association for Near Death Studies,which is co-responsible for the Aware project, who is running the first scientific investigation, involving many universities in Europe and North America, to estab…
yesterday
Kernel, I am new here, only about a week and after I say my part I just might not be back. I try to view all humanities views as their particular life experience having influenced the material world outlook. I see comments on here about books havin…
yesterday
Your above posting is to discourage me from being so church minded. David, David, David, again you fail to separate impact from intent. You are such a reductionist. Because you perceived a church-minded approach you assumed that the posting was inte…
yesterday
Your call for the psychic channel doesn't seem to have much support around here. No point in starting a debate until you can muster at least some support. I'd prefer a group rumble. let's get it over with and set the stage for a modern vision for sc…
yesterday
Problem is that when you're in a state (mystical, whatever) in which you're not yourself anymore, logical anymore, when you're free from the restraints and burdens of your individuality, you see that everything around is incondicional love, as evide…
yesterday
nothing mysterious about it, it's a part of brain function, it's how my brain works to be exact. What is love? ultimately it's efficiency it guides our steps. a team will always defeat a group of individuals. A flat team is better than a pyramid tea…
yesterday
You'll agree especially in science? But as long as the name of this forum isn't redefine science, it would be nice to think about knowledge as a whole; and science will never step into the territory of love, the knowledge of love isn't reducible to…
yesterday
no physics and science is very suborn and slow witted My take really is the problem does not reside in science. The problem is in the individual and that is simply our time in evolution right now. The facts are in reality is a two part reality abstr…
yesterday
They don't know how to live in a world that does'n conform to their ideological misconceptions, even if science, in all its scrupulousness, with the meticulous precision of their experiments, depicts a different reality. They have the brain tilted b…
yesterday

© 2010   Created by Sidian M.S. Jones on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!