The Open Source Religion & Spirituality Project and Religion 2.0
First Evidence that We live in a Multi Universe
If this is true then it should have a fundamental impact on how we view the creation, origin and purpose of our universe
"Vilenkin, meanwhile, is conducting a mathematical census of all the different bubbles that could show up in the multiverse, totting up which values for the physical constants are likely to be shared by the largest number of universes. “We should hopefully be able to make a prediction for the masses of neutrinos [ghostly particles that interact weakly with ordinary atoms] based on which masses are most commonly found in different bubbles,” he says. If future experiments confirm that neutrinos have these predicted masses, that would offer impressive support for the multiverse.
To Mersini-Houghton, the mere fact that serious scientists are having these discussions signals a major turn in physics. “Copernicus shocked the world by telling us that our planet isn’t at the universe’s center,” she says. “We may soon find that our whole universe isn’t even at the cosmic center.”"
"Vilenkin, meanwhile, is conducting a mathematical census of all the different bubbles that could show up in the multiverse, totting up which values for the physical constants are likely to be shared by the largest number of universes. “We should hopefully be able to make a prediction for the masses of neutrinos [ghostly particles that interact weakly with ordinary atoms] based on which masses are most commonly found in different bubbles,” he says. If future experiments confirm that neutrinos have these predicted masses, that would offer impressive support for the multiverse.
To Mersini-Houghton, the mere fact that serious scientists are having these discussions signals a major turn in physics. “Copernicus shocked the world by telling us that our planet isn’t at the universe’s center,” she says. “We may soon find that our whole universe isn’t even at the cosmic center.”"
Tags: a, evidence, first, in, live, multi, that, universe, we
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by James S Saint on -
"A complete 'tit'?... A 'tit'??? ...Hmm..
Well, I would be in good company. Einstein, Schrodinger, and very many thought (and think) they were dangerous and insane too.
I didn't write that story. Did you notice that?
Roman Kozlowski said:James S Saint
You're either very brave in your denunciation of the latest science or a complete tit for saying so.
-
Permalink Reply by Jeff H on -
You're in great company... According to Caesar.. I mean Roman, Jesus was a "wanker", and you’re a "tit", I'm just delusional.... (He doesn't like when people don't say what he wants to hear... remember the coliseum! 8-O
James S Saint said:"A complete 'tit'?... A 'tit'??? ...Hmm..
Well, I would be in good company. Einstein, Schrodinger, and very many thought (and think) they were dangerous and insane too.
I didn't write that story. Did you notice that?
Roman Kozlowski said:James S Saint
You're either very brave in your denunciation of the latest science or a complete tit for saying so.
-
Permalink Reply by db on -
Oh that's tit for tat..... almost to the fact an encyclopedia means "walking around in circles"... did anyone get the dkosopedia reference I made in other discussions regarding OSr and TSC ? I didn't think so..... so where does db really fall into RG as a participant? I really want to know... tell me what to do... to make everyone happy... because I will do it.... because I CAN
db
Jeff H said:You're in great company... According to Caesar.. I mean Roman, Jesus was a "wanker", and you’re a "tit", I'm just delusional.... (He doesn't like when people don't say what he wants to hear... remember the coliseum! 8-O
James S Saint said:"A complete 'tit'?... A 'tit'??? ...Hmm..
Well, I would be in good company. Einstein, Schrodinger, and very many thought (and think) they were dangerous and insane too.
I didn't write that story. Did you notice that?
Roman Kozlowski said:James S Saint
You're either very brave in your denunciation of the latest science or a complete tit for saying so.
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
Welcome to
Redefine God - Open Source Religion and Religion 2.0
About
Books by Amazon
Birthdays
Birthdays Today
Birthdays Tomorrow
Latest Activity
Using the sword of truth like a blunt hammer only isolates.
Jeff, I must ask myself why, as you say, people are worshiping science. Can they not find frameworks, mystery, hope and challenge in spirituality?
Fortunately, it is not necessary that everyone descend into extreme addiction (vice) to develop profo…
Yes David Bee, all potential sources of knowledge should be given an honest look however there are so many sources that it would take years to get through them all. I am suggesting that each one of us here is a potential sources of knowledge. For ex…
Bee, enjoy your book.
Given these "problems" with the Bible, if the God of the Bible is the God of reality (as I believe He is), I do not wonder at all about His reasons for bringing forth the Book of Mormon. The Book of Mormon is the anchor of my faith in Jesus Christ.…
"without any possibility of appreciating its stories of actual greater underlying metaphoric meanings"
Roman, Did Moses lifting serpant for Israel to look upon and be spared the death they were facing have anything to do with the lifting up of Chri…
Jeff. anyone would be bewildered if others insisted they turn away from a profound personal experience. I hope you do not feel I or others are challenging the validity of your experience or belief. We did not come to RG to change each other - did we…
The bible is a great book. Though not perfect by any means in its many years of attempted transliterations involving additions and edits, and as its historical development with its endless diversity of interpretations bares out, even to this day as…
Goodmorning Kernal,
Over a year ago there was a very strident debate between a mormon and I. It was ugly, and I learned from it. I mispoke earlier when I refered to this thread, I meant this topic. You'll note I haven't participated much. I don't w…
Thanks Jeff,
Glad to hear from you and thanks for sharing as you have. I'm not sure I understand your reference (9 hours ago) about bringing this thread back to life? Nevertheless. . .
As for me being full of myself, I can see how you would say tha…
Thanks Katinka. The book referral is appreciated.
Kernal, you're a might full of yourself there bud. I didn't bring this thread back to life, and have resisted jumping into another me vs. mormon debate. Just not worth the trouble. I guess I've grown up a little in my time on RG, even at 49 years.…
Here is how I see it.
We are spiritual beings having a mortal experience. Currently our physical body and our spirit body are inseparably connected until our physical body dies, when we will leave our physical body.
I am unable to physically detect…
I have been taught, and believe, that it is only with an open mind can one find the truth. I do not believe that there will be any conflict between scientific fact/truth and religious fact/truth, when all is known. Theories are not fact, but are par…
I also believe that our spiritual selves are made up of a form of matter much finer that what we can perceive with our physical bodies, but matter none the less, which cannot be destroyed - maybe of a material like "dark" matter.
DB, you suggest tha…
David Bee. Personally, as once a theologiacal academic that has moved into the fields of science. May I say that I admire your own personal ability as a modernday christian in being able to stand back and open mindedly take part in these discussions…
When we fully understand teleportation, if it is really possible, maybe we will know how beings from another world manage to visit this one, as some claim to have been visited? The realm of possibilities expand as we learn.
© 2010 Created by Sidian M.S. Jones on Ning. Create a Ning Network!
